Website Metrics and Site Statistics by NextSTAT PCRM >> News and Media Center >> New Study Shows Animal-Based Testing of Drugs and Chemicals Puts Unborn Children at Risk of Birth Defects
PCRM Home
Media CenterHealthResearchAbout PCRM CatalogJoin Us
PCRM Home
 


News Release Archive 2005

e-mail this page

 

NEWS RELEASE

May 26, 2005

New Study Shows Animal-Based Testing of Drugs and Chemicals Puts
Unborn Children at Risk of Birth Defects

Drug and Chemical Tests Using Animals Fail
to Predict Birth Defect Risk Half the Time

WASHINGTON—Pregnant women may unknowingly be putting their unborn children at risk of birth defects by taking over-the-counter medications and prescription drugs, and using common household chemicals, according to a new study published in the May issue of the research journal, Biogenic Amines.

“The Future of Teratology Is In Vitro” shows that many common drugs and household chemicals have been certified as safe for humans on the basis of animal tests that are accurate on average slightly more than half the time.

“We are betting the health of our children on odds just slightly better than a coin flip,” said principal author Jarrod Bailey, Ph.D., project development coordinator at the University of Newcastle Upon Tyne School of Population and Health Sciences.

Potential teratogens—drugs and chemicals that can cause birth defects during pregnancy—are tested on animals, including mice, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys. None of these animal tests can accurately predict how the substances will affect humans, said Dr. Bailey. “There are simply too many differences in physiology and biochemistry,” he noted.


“We are betting the health of our children on odds just slightly better than a coin flip.” --Jarrod Bailey, Ph.D.

As a result, researchers test drugs and compounds across a wide spectrum of species, a practice that leads to conflicting and often useless results. Among the examples cited: Cortisone has teratogenic effects on every animal species tested, but none in humans. Valium can cause fetal malformations in humans during the first trimester of pregnancy, but causes none in rats.

According to the report’s authors, “Virtually all known human teratogens have so far been identified in spite of, rather than because of, animal-based methods.” The answer, said Bailey, is in vitro, or test-tube based, technology. “Embryonic stem cell tests (EST) are more effective in detecting potential embryotoxicities than tests using animals,” he said.

“It is time to admit that animal-based testing is an abject failure,” Bailey added. “An estimated 50,000 to 70,000 new chemicals and up to 400 new drugs are introduced to the market every year. Every year we delay, every year we continue to rely on animal testing, brings us that much closer to another tragedy like thalidomide.”

Founded in 1985, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is a nonprofit health organization that promotes preventive medicine, especially good nutrition. PCRM also conducts clinical research studies, opposes unethical human experimentation, and promotes alternatives to animal research.

###

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
5100 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Ste. 400, Washington, DC 20016
Phone: 202-686-2210 | Email: pcrm@pcrm.org

CONTACT
Howard White
202-686-2210, ext. 339
hwhite@pcrm.org

Jarrod Bailey, Ph.D.

RELATED LINKS

"The future of teratology research is in vitro" by Jarrod Bailey, Andrew Knight, and Jonathan Balcombe

PCRM Position Paper on Animal Research

Humane Charity Seal of Approval Web site

PCRM NEWS RELEASE ARCHIVE
MAIL OPTIONS

Subscribe to PCRM's news release distribution list

Unsubscribe from PCRM's news release distribution list


2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000


Media Center | Health | Research | About PCRM | Catalog | Join Us | Search | Site Index | Home

The site does not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes only.
Full Disclaimer
| Privacy Policy