DONATE
FOR PHYSICIANS
HEALTH AND NUTRITION
ETHICAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION
  Action Alerts
  Education and Training
  Research
  Animal Testing and Alternatives
  Health Care Professionals
  Breaking Research News
MEDIA CENTER
LEGISLATIVE FOCUS
CLINICAL RESEARCH
EDUCATIONAL LITERATURE
MEMBERSHIP
SHOP

Connect with Us

 

 

The Physicians Committee



Download this fact sheet Priorities for Research in Spinal Cord Injury

Research on spinal cord injuries aims to prevent, minimize, or repair neural tissue damage, reduce the sequelae of injury, and improve function. While animals have been used by a number of investigators, other avenues of research have demonstrated great potential. A few particularly promising research modalities are described below.

Clinical Therapies. At the Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona, Dr. Richard Herman has shown that, through a process of retraining the neuromuscular circuitry, some partially paralyzed patients are able to walk again.1,2 This research combines weight-bearing therapy on a treadmill and electrical stimulation of the spinal cord by a device surgically implanted into the epidural area (between the spinal cord and spine). Partial weight-bearing therapy “trains” the body in a regular gait and reduces spasticity of the muscles, while the electrical stimulation device reduces the energetic cost of walking. The training periods and treatment parameters must be individualized, taking into account each patient’s clinical status. While still in its early stages, this combination of therapies appears promising. Herman et al.1 first reported the progress of a wheelchair-dependent individual who had sub-functional motor strength in lower limb muscles and some large fiber sensation. The patient was classified as being at an ASIA C [on a scale of A (complete injury) to E (normal)] level of function, according to the nomenclature of the American Spinal Injury Association. After several months of training, this individual was able to walk for at least 250 meters, and the patient’s ability to perform independent tasks was increased substantially. A second patient had similar results, doubling his walking speed and covering distances of at least 325 meters.2

Patients with a spinal cord injury are often at risk for aliments that can result from activity restriction, such as bone and muscle loss, weight gain, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and circulatory dysfunction.3-5 A number of researchers are working to develop training programs and devices to counteract such conditions.

Scientists in Miami are conducting a number of studies with patients with varying levels of injury and fitness. Several studies have found that training programs emphasizing upper body exercises, such as neuromuscular stimulation-assisted arm crank ergometry (ACE)6 or circuit resistance training ACE,7,8 can increase patients’ physical fitness levels and upper body strength and lower patients’ plasma triglycerides and cholesterol, lessening cardiovascular risk. One study found that neuromuscular stimulation allowed patients to increase arm strength above and beyond standard ergometry.6

Patients with incomplete spinal injuries can also benefit from assisted lower body exercise. Functional electric stimulation (FES), body weight support (BWS), and treadmill training are training strategies being tested for improvements in walking speed, leg strength, intralimb coordination, and cardiovascular benefits.9-11 University of Miami clinicians developed the Parastep 1 ambulation system, which has since been shown to increase resting lower extremity blood flow and alleviate vascular occlusion in paraplegic patients,5 increase patients’ abilities to complete other exercise programs,12 allow patients with complete thoracic spinal injuries to ambulate short distances, and over time increased lower body muscle tissue.13 The system consists of an electronic stimulator and a modified walking frame with switches controlled by the operator’s fingers, allowing the user to control the stimulation parameters and activate the stepping. Use of Parastep 1 was also shown to increase a patient’s sense of physical self and decrease depression scores on standard tests.14

Those with chronic spinal cord injuries often report pain that is difficult to characterize or treat. Clinicians in Miami are working to develop comprehensive physical and verbal evaluation tools to both classify patients’ pain sensations and determine the best treatments. Widerstrom-Noga et al.15 were able to identify common clinical patterns of pain, grouping survey respondents’ responses into three groups. The groupings will make potential treatments easier to develop, classify, and test clinically. Widerstrom-Noga and Turk16 found that respondents who sought “physical therapies” (massage, etc.) to control pain reported alleviation of symptoms more often than those who were taking prescription medications. In fact, those taking medication reported more intense pain symptoms. Muscle spasticity is another common problem for which clinicians are searching for answers. While currently used medications like botox or tizanidine continue to be evaluated,17 University of Miami researchers are collaborating with other hospitals to test anecdotal evidence that vibratory stimulation can alleviate muscle spasticity. A case study series done in the United Kingdom highlights the importance of considering psychological factors: all four patients reported improvements in somatic complaints—including unexplained pain, spasm, pressure sores, constipation, and other minor physical problems—with resolutions in psychosocial issues.18

Efforts to improve the quality of life for SCI patients also include studies to determine ways to improve sexual dysfunction. Scientists in the UK have found that sildenafil citrate (Viagra) can improve sexual function in those with incomplete and complete injuries.19 University of Miami researchers investigated genital, subjective, and autonomic responses to visual and manual sexual stimuli, in order to better characterize the sexual potential of women with spinal injuries.20

According to Cardenas et al.,21 patients with paraplegia are most likely to be rehospitalized after their injury for pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers, or sores, in the skin are a result of long periods of inactivity of certain parts of the body; they can be particularly insidious because the patient cannot sense the ulcer and so has no idea it exists.22 Without treatment, the ulcer can injure surrounding skin and muscle and result in fatal systemic infections. A number of strategies for early detection of pressure sores have been tested, including self-inspection23 and temperature difference measurement.24 Both interventions were able to detect developing pressure sores earlier than controls. Vitamin supplementation to prevent pressure ulcers and improve overall health is being investigated in Texas.25 For some patients, carbon fiber implants placed at past or future pressure sore sites help augment skin tissue and are well tolerated.26

Quality of life for spinal cord injury patients can also be affected by difficulty with urinary and colonic evacuation. Constipation, incontinence, and impaction can lead to significant distress and affect a patient’s ability to overcome other health issues they may face.27 Korsten et al.27 found that compared to able-bodied controls, colonic pressure activity for study volunteers was depressed during sleep. Authors also found that an abdominal belt with electrodes implanted into patients’ abdominal wall musculature improved time to first stool and total bowel care time versus controls. A multi-center trial coordinated in Cleveland28 evaluated the efficacy and safety of a neuroprosthesis implanted in patients with complete suprasacral SCIs. This externally controlled device stimulated the sacral nerves, improving overall evacuation continence and decreasing drug use, urinary tract infections, catheter use, and time spent with bowel management. Schurch et al.,29 however, found no improvement in five patients after sacral nerve stimulation for five days, suggesting that treatments must be individualized to be effective.

Neural and Stem Cell Culture. In vitro research using neural and stem cell cultures or whole spinal cord culture, while still in its infancy, can provide information about the efficacy and toxicity of novel therapies as well about the pathology of tissue injury. For example, a group of London researchers found that damage to spinal cord neurons in cell culture was prevented by inhibiting a specific nuclear enzyme apparently involved in peroxynitrite-induced cell damage after injury.30 A procedure to create human motoneuron cell lines in culture was developed in 2000.31 Researchers found the cloned neurons displayed normal neuronal processes, including immunoreactivity and action potential firing, and researchers were also able to coax clonal precursor cells into multiple types of spinal cord neurons.31 Genetic microarrays, used extensively in clinical cancer research, can reveal genetic changes in neural cells at specific time points after injury or during a course of treatment.

Flow cytometry helped Basu et al.32 characterize the degree of leukocytospermia in men with SCI by comparing patients’ semen samples to those of men without SCI. They found that, when compared to men without SCI, the semen of men with SCI showed increased numbers of activated, mature granulocytes and lymphocytes, most of which were T cells. These immunologically active cells may provide an explanation for the abnormally low sperm motility often seen in men with SCI.

Imaging and Electrodiagnostic Studies. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as PET, SPECT, and fMRI, as well as more invasive cerebrospinal fluid studies, can be used to visualize neural pathology at various time points after injury and monitor the effects of experimental therapies. Electromyography and auditory, visual, or somatosensory evoked potentials measure the extent of spinal cord injuries and have demonstrated that reconnection and regeneration of nerves in humans is possible.33,34 Further, by studying neuromuscular connections in both uninjured and spinal cord-injured patients, University of Miami School of Medicine scientists have found mechanisms in the spinal cord that are responsible for coordinating opposing muscle movements.35

Evidence-Driven Injury Modeling. In Miami, researchers are collaborating on the Human Spinal Cord Injury Model project. This project is studying spinal cord injured patients, both pre- and post-mortem, to build a more realistic understanding of human spinal cord injury. Post-mortem spinal cord tissue can be compared to MRIs to determine histopathological changes in cells and tissues.36,37 By correlating neurological function, neurophysiological status, imaging studies, and histopathology, researchers can design more rational therapies to help improve the quality of life of injured patients, prevent further damage after acute injury, and restore function in chronic victims.

Educating Future Scientists. The instruction of scientists interested in spinal cord injury research should be as broad as the methods and programs delineated here. There are several ways in which a course that prepares students for the spinal injury research field could be conducted. A particularly apt program could involve shadowing a number of researchers from different disciplines as they conduct their research. While we do not recommend continued reliance on experimental animal models, when techniques using animals are perceived as necessary, animal care, surgical techniques, and methodologies can be taught without using additional animals. A host of non-animal learning tools are available. Video films showing animal care principles, microsurgical techniques, and transplantation procedures can offer a valuable learning experience, and a number of comprehensive models are also available. One example is the PVC rat model, available from the Microsurgical Developments Foundation, that allows students to practice 25 different surgical techniques, and includes a computer-based supplement to teach students how to handle anesthetic care and emergency situations that may arise. The University of Arkansas has developed a cadaver head model, complete with blood flow capabilities, for teaching microsurgery to aspiring neurosurgeons. Information on these models, as well as suggested MedLine search terms to find published research, can be found on the Web at http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/Animal_Alternatives/lab_an_protocol.htm.

References
1. Herman, R, J He, S D’Luzansky, W Willis, S. Dilli. 2002. Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic incomplete spinal cord injured. Spinal Cord. 40(2):65-68.
2. Carhart MR, J He, R Herman, S D’Luzansky, WT Willis. 2004. Epidural spinal-cord stimulation facilitates recovery of function walking following incomplete spinal-cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 12(1):32-42.
3. Bauman WA, AM Spungen. 2001. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 24(4):266-277.
4. Needham-Shropshire BM, JG Broton, KJ Klose, N Lebwohl, RS Guest, PL Jacobs. 1997. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 3. Lack of effect on bone mineral density. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78(8):799-803.
5. Nash MS, PL Jacobs, BM Montalvo, KJ Klose, RS Guest, BM Needham-Shropshire. 1997. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 5. Lower extremity blood flow and typeremic responses to occlusion are augmented by ambulation training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78(8):808-814.
6. Needham-Shropshire BM, JG Broton, TL Cameron, KJ Klose. 1997. Improved motor function in tetraplegics following neuromuscular stimulation-assisted arm ergometry. J Spinal Cord Med. 20(1):49-55.
7. Jacobs PL, MS Nash, JW Rusinowski. 2001. Circuit training provides cardiorespiratory and strength benefits in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 33(5):711-717.
8. Nash MS, PL Jacobs, AJ Mendez, RB Goldberg. 2001. Circuit resistance training imporves the atherogenic lipid profiles of persons with chronic paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 24(1):2-9.
9. Field-Fote EC. 2001. Combined use of body weight support, fuctional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82(6):818-824.
10. Field-Fote EC and D Tepavac. 2002. Improved intralimb coordination in people with incomplete spinal cord injury following training with body weight support and electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 82(7):707-715.
11. Jacobs PL, B Johnson, ET Mahoney. 2003. Physiologic responses to electrically assisted and frame-supported standing in persons with paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 26(4):384-389.
12. Jacobs PL, MS Nash, KJ Klose, RS Guest, BM Needham-Shropshire, BA Green. 1997. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 2. Effects on physiological responses to peak arm ergometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78(8):794-798.
13. Klose KJ, PL Jacobs, JG Groton, RS Guest, BM Needham-Shropshire, N Lebwohl, MS Nash, BA Green. 1997. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 1. Ambulation performance and anthropometric measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78(8):789-793.
14. Guest RS, KJ Klose, BM Needham-Shropshire, PL Jacobs. 1997. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system: part 4. Effect on physical self-concept and depression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78(8):804-807.
15. Widerstrom-Noga EG, E Felipe-Cuervo, RP Yezierski. 2001. Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82(9):1191-1197.
16. Widerstrom-Noga EG and DC Turk. 2003. Types and effectiveness of treatments used by people with chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: influence of pain and psychosocial characteristics. Spinal Cord. 41(11):600-609.
17. Nance PW, J Bugaresti, K Shellenberger, W Sheremata, A Martinez-Arizala. 1994. Efficacy and safety of tizanidine in the treatment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. North American tizandine study group. Neurology. 44(11 Suppl 9):S44-51.
18. Mathew KM, G Ravichandran, K May, K Morsley. 2001. The biophyschosocial model and spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 39(12):644-649.
19. Derry F, C Hultling, AD Seftel, ML Sipski. 2002. Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in men with erectile dysfunction and spinal cord injury: a review. Urology. 60(2 Suppl 2):49-57.
20. Sipski ML, CJ Alexander, R Rosen. 2001. Sexual arousal and organsm in women: effects of spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol. 49(1):35-44.
21. Cardenas DD, JM Hoffman, S Kirshblum, W McKinley. 2004. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 85(11):1757-1763.
22. Gibson L. 2002. Perceptions of pressure ulcers among young men with a spinal injury. Br J Community Nurs. 7(9):451-460.
23. Raghavan P, WA Raza, YS Ahmed, MA Chamberlain. 2003. Prevalence of pressure sores in a community sample of spinal injury patients. Clin Rehabil. 17(8):879-884.
24. Sprigle S, M Linden, D McKenna, K Davis, B Riordan. 2001. Clinical skin temperature measurement to predict incipient pressure ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 14(3):133-137.
25. Moussavi RM, HM Garza, SG Eisele, G Rodriguez, DH Rintala. 2003. Serum levels of vitamins A, C, and E in persons with chronic spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 84(7):1061-1067.
26. Minns RJ and RA Sutton. 1991. Carbon fibre pad insertion as a method of achieving soft tissue augmentation in order to reduce the liability to pressure sore development in the spinal injury patient. Br J Plast Surg. 44(8):615-618.
27. Korsten MA, NR Fajardo, AS Rosman, GH Creasey, AM Spungen, WA Bauman. 2004. Difficulty with evacuation after spinal cord injury: Colonic motility during sleep and effects of abdominal wall stimulation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 41(1):95-100.
28. Creasey GH, JH Grill, M Korsten, U HS, R Betz, R Anderson, J Walter, Implanted Neuroprosthesis Research group. 2001. An implantable neuroprosthesis for restoring bladder and bowel control to patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82(11):1512-1519.
29. Schurch B, I Reilly, A Reigz, A Curt. 2003. Electrophysiological recordings during the peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) test in complete spinal cord injury patients. World J Urol. 20(6):319-322.
30. Scott GS, C Szabo, DC Hooper. 2004. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity contributes to peroxynitrite induced spinal cord neuronal cell death in vitro. J Neurotrauma. 21(9):1255-1263.
31. Li R, S Thode, N Richard, J Pardinas, MS Rao, DW Sah. 2000. Motoneuron differentiation of immortalized human spinal cord cell lines. J Neurosci Res. 59(3):342-352.
32. Basu S, CM Lynne, P Ruiz, TC Aballa, SM Ferrell, NL Brackett. 2002. Cytoflorographic identification of activated T-cell subpopulations in the semen of men with spinal cord injuries. J Androl. 23(4):551-556.
33. Calancie B, S Lutton, JG Broton. 1996. Central nervous system plasticity after spinal cord injury in man: interlimb reflexes and the influence of cutaneous stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 101(4):304-315.
34. Calancie B, MR Molano, JG Broton. 2002. Interlimb reflexes and synaptic plasticity become evident months after human spinal cord injury. Brain. 125(Pt 5):1150-1161.
35. Perez MA, EC Field-Fote. 2003. Impaired posture-dependent modulation of disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurosci Lett. 341(3):225-228.
36. Emery E, P Aldana, MB Bunge, W Puckett, A Srinivasan, RW Keane, J Bethea, AD Levi. 1998. Apoptosis after traumatic human spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg. 89(6):911-920.
37. Bruce JH, MD Norenberg, S Kraydieh, W Puckett, A Marcillo, D Dietrich. 2000. Schwannosis: role of gliosis and proteoglycan in human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 17(9):781-788.

This site does not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for informational purposes only.
Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

The Physicians Committee
5100 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Ste.400, Washington DC, 20016
Phone: 202-686-2210     Email: pcrm@pcrm.org