DONATE
FOR PHYSICIANS
HEALTH AND NUTRITION
ETHICAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION
MEDIA CENTER
LEGISLATIVE FOCUS
CLINICAL RESEARCH
EDUCATIONAL LITERATURE
MEMBERSHIP
SHOP

Connect with Us

 

 

The Physicians Committee



Cosmetics Testing: End the use of animals in personal care product testing

 

Cosmetics Regulation Reform in the United States

Cosmetics Regulation Reform | Cosmetics Regulation Reform FAQ | Cosmetics Regulation Reform Resources

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: Representative Jim Moran (VA) introduced a landmark bill to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals. PCRM supports this bill and is continuing to monitor all U.S. cosmetics legislative efforts and meet with allies and congressional staff.

In March 2014, Representative Jim Moran (VA) introduced a landmark bill, the Humane Cosmetics Act (H.R. 4148), to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals. This historic legislation would not only end animal testing for cosmetics within the United States but also prohibit the sale of products that have been tested elsewhere—forcing other countries we do business with to stop testing as well.

Specifically, the bill would:

  • within one year of enactment, prohibit the testing of cosmetic ingredients and final products on animals in the US
  • prohibit the export and import of animal tested cosmetics within three years of enactment

This important bill would also put the United States on the same footing as its economic competitors. As it is, the United States is behind the times. The European Union has banned both cosmetic testing and the sale of cosmetics tested on animals—requiring even American companies to stop testing on animals if they want to sell to European customers. India, Israel, and parts of Brazil have followed in the EU's footsteps. Australia has also introduced a similar ban.

However, earlier in the congressional session, the House of Representatives, with the goal of improving cosmetics safety and regulation, introduced H.R. 1385 Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013. But this well-intentioned bill has serious flaws, and would essentially mandate animal testing.

To be effective, new regulations for cosmetics must embrace efficient cell- and computer-based testing and assessment strategies. Otherwise, the legislation could lead to significant increases in misleading and inhumane animal testing. To learn more, read our background paper on cosmetics regulation and safety testing and the Safe Cosmetics Act FAQ.

It is time to abandon this inhumane and costly practice, and to adopt more ethical, efficient, and cost-effective nonanimal testing methods that are already widely available.



 

Cosmetics Regulation Reform in the United States

International Cosmetics Regulation Reform

Animal Testing 101

Have You Modernized Your Safety Program?

Cosmetics Home

NEWS AND UPDATES

More Than a Makeup Trend: New Survey Shows 72 percent of Americans Oppose Testing Cosmetics Products on Animals

Doctors Group Urges Europe to Uphold 2013 Ban on Animal-Tested Cosmetics with Nearly 25,000 Letters of Support

Actress Alicia Silverstone Urges EU to Keep Deadline for Ban on Marketing Animal-Tested Cosmetics

Actress Kristin Bauer Urges EU to Keep Deadline for Ban on Marketing Animal-Tested Cosmetics

 
This site does not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for informational purposes only.
Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

The Physicians Committee
5100 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Ste.400, Washington DC, 20016
Phone: 202-686-2210     Email: pcrm@pcrm.org